Skip to contents

This page documents every column in all_data, the pooled dataset described on the sample description page. It is meant to serve the same purpose as the data dictionaries shared alongside the flat merged_data.xlsx file archived on OSF, for anyone who wants to reuse the data without also pulling in this package.

The tables below are computed directly from all_data rather than typed out by hand, so they cannot drift out of sync with the data itself. A machine-readable version of this same information, following the Psych-DS dataset_description.json convention, is archived alongside the data on OSF.

Core variables

Variable Description Type Range / levels N missing
study Study of origin. string burns, monzel, mas, ruby, kvamme 0
lang Language in which the study was administered. string en, fr 0
id Unique participant identifier (“subj__“), unique across the whole pooled dataset. string subj_[study]_[number] 0
sex Sex assigned at birth, as reported by the participant. string female, male, other 1
gender Gender identity, as reported by the participant, where collected separately from sex. string female, male, other 1
age Participant age in years, self-reported. integer 10-86 3
vviq Total score on the VVIQ (Marks, 1973), summed across all 16 items. Lower scores indicate weaker/absent visual imagery. integer 16-80 0
tas Total score on the TAS-20 (Bagby et al., 1994), summed across all 20 items (already reverse-scored where applicable). Higher scores indicate greater alexithymia. integer 20-94 0
tas_identify Difficulty Identifying Feelings (DIF) subscale of the TAS-20. Sum of items 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14. integer 7-35 0
tas_describe Difficulty Describing Feelings (DDF) subscale of the TAS-20. Sum of items 2, 4, 11, 12, 17. integer 5-25 0
tas_external Externally Oriented Thinking (EOT) subscale of the TAS-20. Sum of items 5, 8, 10, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20. integer 8-36 0
tas_group Alexithymia status from the standard TAS-20 cutoff (total >= 61 = alexithymia). string alexithymia, typical_tas 0
vviq_group_4 VVIQ group, 4 levels: aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical, hyperphantasia. string aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical, hyperphantasia 0
vviq_group_3 VVIQ group, 3 levels: aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical (typical and hyperphantasia collapsed). string aphantasia, hypophantasia, typical 0
vviq_group_2 VVIQ group, 2 levels: aphantasia, typical (broadest split). string aphantasia, typical 0

VVIQ item-level responses (vviq_q1-vviq_q16)

The VVIQ (Marks, 1973) has no subscales; its 16 items are grouped into 4 scenes of 4 items each (a relative or friend you often see; the rising sun; the front of a familiar shop; a country scene with trees, mountains, and a lake), each rated 1 (“perfectly clear and as vivid as normal vision”) to 5 (“no image at all”). Item wording is not reproduced here, as it is copyrighted by the scale’s author — see Marks (1973) for the original items.

Variable Scene Type Range / levels N missing
vviq_q1 a relative or friend you often see integer 1-5 105
vviq_q2 a relative or friend you often see integer 1-5 105
vviq_q3 a relative or friend you often see integer 1-5 105
vviq_q4 a relative or friend you often see integer 1-5 105
vviq_q5 the rising sun integer 1-5 105
vviq_q6 the rising sun integer 1-5 105
vviq_q7 the rising sun integer 1-5 105
vviq_q8 the rising sun integer 1-5 105
vviq_q9 the front of a familiar shop integer 1-5 105
vviq_q10 the front of a familiar shop integer 1-5 105
vviq_q11 the front of a familiar shop integer 1-5 105
vviq_q12 the front of a familiar shop integer 1-5 105
vviq_q13 a country scene with trees, mountains, and a lake integer 1-5 105
vviq_q14 a country scene with trees, mountains, and a lake integer 1-5 105
vviq_q15 a country scene with trees, mountains, and a lake integer 1-5 105
vviq_q16 a country scene with trees, mountains, and a lake integer 1-5 105

Item-level VVIQ data are available for the burns, mas, ruby, and kvamme studies. They are missing (NA) for all 105 Monzel participants, for whom only total scores were shared.

TAS-20 item-level responses (tas_q1-tas_q20)

The TAS-20 (Bagby et al., 1994) has 20 items rated 1 (“strongly disagree”) to 5 (“strongly agree”), assigned to the three sub-scales described above. Item wording is not reproduced here, as it is copyrighted by the scale’s authors — see Bagby et al. (1994) for the original items.

Five items (4, 5, 10, 18, 19) are reverse-keyed on the original scale. Values in tas_q4, tas_q5, tas_q10, tas_q18, and tas_q19 in all_data/merged_data.xlsx are already reverse-scored — summing tas_q1-tas_q20 directly reproduces the tas total column, with no further reversal needed.

Variable Subscale Reverse-keyed Type Range / levels N missing
tas_q1 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q2 DDF integer 1-5 105
tas_q3 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q4 DDF yes (already reversed) integer 1-5 105
tas_q5 EOT yes (already reversed) integer 1-5 105
tas_q6 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q7 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q8 EOT integer 1-5 105
tas_q9 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q10 EOT yes (already reversed) integer 1-5 105
tas_q11 DDF integer 1-5 105
tas_q12 DDF integer 1-5 105
tas_q13 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q14 DIF integer 1-5 105
tas_q15 EOT integer 1-5 105
tas_q16 EOT integer 1-5 105
tas_q17 DDF integer 1-5 105
tas_q18 EOT yes (already reversed) integer 1-5 105
tas_q19 EOT yes (already reversed) integer 1-5 105
tas_q20 EOT integer 1-5 105

Item-level TAS-20 data are available for the same four studies as the VVIQ items above, and missing for the same 105 Monzel participants.

A note on sex and gender

For most participants, sex and gender coincide. The Burns study collected both constructs separately, and a small number of participants (n = 4) reported a sex and gender that differ.


Continuing through the Extended Online Report: this page is a technical reference, meant to be partially independent from the rest of the vignettes. See the sample description page for how the five studies were combined, or get back to the home page.


References

Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A., & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x